39% of Trans Men and Nonbinary People Reported Regret About Fertility Choices After Reproductive-Organ Removal

Fertility preservation choices and decisional regret after gender-affirming surgery in transgender men or gender nonbinary persons

Authors
Austin Johnson, Asha B. McClurg, Janine Baldino, Rajeshree Das, Erin T. Carey
Journal
F&S Reports
Year
2024

Summary

Surgeons at the University of North Carolina surveyed trans men and nonbinary people who had their womb and/or ovaries removed. They asked about regret over the fertility decisions made before surgery, not regret about the surgery itself. Of 57 people who replied, about 2.5 years after surgery, 39% had at least mild regret and 16% moderate to severe regret. Nearly everyone had turned down seeing a fertility specialist, most often because they did not want children at the time, and no one froze eggs or embryos. Records said all had been given fertility advice, but only 30% remembered it, and those who felt the advice was poor had more regret. More people rated having a family in future as important after surgery than before. With only half replying, one clinic and short follow-up, the true level of regret is uncertain and could be higher or lower.

Key findings

  • 57 of 112 trans men and nonbinary people (51%) who had their reproductive organs removed at the University of North Carolina in 2014 to 2023 answered the survey, about 2.5 years after surgery on average.
  • On a tested regret questionnaire, 39% had regret about the fertility choices they made before surgery: 23% mild and 16% moderate to severe (scores up to 85 out of 100).
  • Medical records showed every person was given fertility advice, but only 30% remembered being told about fertility or ways of having a family.
  • Records showed 97% were offered a fertility specialist, but only 3 people (5.5%) accepted, and none went on to freeze eggs or embryos.
  • The most common reason for saying no was not wanting children at the time (68%), followed by plans to adopt, worry about stopping testosterone, and fear that pregnancy would worsen gender distress.
  • Regret was much higher in people who felt the advice about effects on fertility was poor (a typical score of 50 vs 0), and somewhat higher in those who felt advice on fertility options was poor (12.5 vs 0).
  • More people rated having children or a family in future as important at the time of the survey than before surgery, suggesting views can change after surgery.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional.

SETTING: University-based pratice.

PATIENTS: A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division.

INTERVENTION: Survey or questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0-100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment.

RESULTS: The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). "Mild" to "severe" decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0-85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion.

CONCLUSIONS: Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.

Conclusion

Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret. (Full text adds that care should include equitable access to family-building options in the context of decreasing access to gender-affirming care.)