زوكر: التحول الاجتماعي للأطفال الصغار علاج يرجَّح أن يزيد الاستمرار وقد يكون طبي المنشأ

نقاش: لكل شخص طريقته

Authors
Kenneth J. Zucker
Journal
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Year
2020

Summary

In a short debate piece, Kenneth Zucker, a psychologist who led the Toronto CAMH child gender clinic until 2015, argues that socially transitioning a young child (new name, pronouns, presentation) is not a neutral act but a form of treatment. Older follow-up studies found that most children with gender distress who did not transition no longer had it after puberty. So he predicts that early social transition will make it much more likely the distress lasts, often leading to lifelong hormones and surgery. He suggests this could be called iatrogenic, meaning caused by the treatment itself. He asks doctors to respect families' differing views. It is an informed expert opinion and a key statement of the view that social transition is a treatment, but it offers no new data.

Key findings

  • يصف زوكر التحول الاجتماعي للأطفال قبل البلوغ بأنه علاج يهدف إلى تقليل الكرب الجندري، لا خطوة محايدة أو داعمة فحسب.
  • يرى أن التحول الاجتماعي المبكر يرجح أن يؤدي إلى علاج طبي مدى الحياة: هرمونات مغايرة وجراحة.
  • يتنبأ بأن التحول الاجتماعي «سيزيد بشكل كبير» مدى تكرار استمرار الكرب الجندري، مقارنة بالدراسات الأقدم لأطفال لم يتحولوا.
  • يقترح أن هذا الأثر «قد يُوصف بأنه علاجي المنشأ»، أي أن الكرب المستمر ناجم جزئياً عن التحول نفسه.
  • يدعو إلى الاحترام والتفهم تجاه الأهل الذين لديهم آراء مختلفة حول أفضل طريقة لمساعدة طفلهم.
  • المقال جزء من سلسلة نقاش عام 2020 في Child and Adolescent Mental Health ضمت أيضاً مقالات لرين ومينيس وثيودوسيو وبتلر وهتشينسون.

Abstract

A gender social transition in prepubertal children is a form of psychosocial treatment that aims to reduce gender dysphoria, but with the likely consequence of subsequent (lifelong) biomedical treatments as well (gender-affirming hormonal treatment and surgery). Gender social transition of prepubertal children will increase dramatically the rate of gender dysphoria persistence when compared to follow-up studies of children with gender dysphoria who did not receive this type of psychosocial intervention and, oddly enough, might be characterized as iatrogenic. Parents who bring their children for clinical care hold different philosophical views on what is the best way to help reduce the gender dysphoria, which require both respect and understanding.

Conclusion

Social transition of prepubertal children should be understood as a psychosocial treatment with likely downstream biomedical consequences; it will probably increase persistence of gender dysphoria relative to earlier follow-up studies and might be characterised as iatrogenic. Parents hold differing philosophical views about how best to reduce their child's gender dysphoria, and these require both respect and understanding.