Summary

Lemma, a psychoanalyst, reflects on her work with teenagers seeking puberty blockers (drugs that pause puberty) or hormones. She argues that 'trans' has become a powerful identity and cultural category, but that some young people may take it up too early. That can shut down the painful inner work needed to understand why they feel as they do. She describes how hard it is to ask 'why transgender?' when that question is widely seen as treating it as an illness. She urges therapists to stay equally curious about all possible paths, including medical transition. She firmly rejects using therapy to change anyone's identity, and warns that policing debate harms thinking. The essay is based on a few anonymous cases from her own practice. It sheds light on dilemmas therapists face, but gives no evidence of how often these patterns happen or what follows.

Key findings

• Lemma argumenterer for, at ‘trans’-etiketten dækker et komplekst spektrum af indre oplevelser i forhold til folks angivne seksuelle præferencer og kønsidentiteter.
• Ud fra sit arbejde med under 18-årige, der søger medicinsk behandling, beskriver hun tilfælde, hvor det at tage en trans-identitet på tidligt syntes at stå i vejen for det smertefulde arbejde med at forstå, hvad det betød for den unge.
• Hun bemærker, at spørgsmålet ‘hvorfor transkønnet’ (frem for ‘hvordan transkønnet’) ofte opleves som at behandle det som en sygdom, hvilket gør det svært for terapeuter at udforske.
• Hun anbefaler ‘ækvidistant nysgerrighed’, altså lige stor nysgerrighed over for, hvad en trans-identitet betyder og gør for personen, hvilket hun siger er forskelligt fra stille tvivl.
• Hendes sagsmateriale omfatter angiveligt en 17-årig pige, der besluttede ikke at transitionere efter fem års dybdegående terapi.
• Hun siger, at terapi aldrig må bruges til at presse eller ændre folk, indrømmer sit fagområdes tidligere skade på homoseksuelle og siger, at kønsskifteoperation er den rette vej for nogle patienter.
• Hun indrømmer, at hendes egne synspunkter er ‘gennemsyret af konventionelle kønsforestillinger’, og opfordrer til dialog mellem forskellige synspunkter.

Abstract

The capacity of transgender to incorporate all gender variance and sexual preferences has become a powerful tool of activism and personal identification. Rather than being an index of marginality 'trans' has become a central cultural site. In this paper, I will argue that this identity label encompasses a complex range of internal psychic positions in relation to consciously stated sexual preferences and gender identifications. My aim is to explore what can appear to be in some cases a premature embracement of the empowering potential of the transgender identification through my work with under 18-year-olds who are seeking medical intervention for gender dysphoria. This can undermine the painful psychic work required to establish what transgender means for any given young person. In an external culture where to ask 'why transgender' (as opposed to 'how transgender') is felt to be pathologising, working with these young people can prove difficult for the analyst. The challenge is to tread the fine line between a dialogue based on an equidistant curiosity about meaning and function that is core to an analytic approach, and a posture of implicit skepticism.

Conclusion

My experiential and theoretical reference points are steeped in conventional gender ideas. The grids of intelligibility that frame subjective experience inevitably limit every author, which is precisely why dialogue with others is vital so that we can ensure that we understand the different meanings of transgender identity and do justice to the heterogeneity of experience within the transgender community. Only this way can we assist more effectively those who seek our help. This will include those individuals for whom SRS is the chosen way forwards as well as those for whom this is unlikely to provide a solution. Psychoanalysis has an invidious history in relation to the prejudiced stance it took with respect to homosexuality and we must be careful not to repeat mistakes of the past when we approach transgender. Psychoanalysis should never be used as a tool of coercion or conversion – however subtle – when it comes to individual choices about how to live one's life. However, dialogue is a multi-way process and requires us all to tolerate many voices with a respect for the differences that this will expose. The policing of discourse runs the risk of atrophying thinking and consolidating prejudice rather than exposing it.