Summary
Clinicians at a Washington, DC children's gender clinic reviewed the records of 68 teenagers who had asked for cross-sex hormones or surgery. They also interviewed each young person's mental health clinician about how those requests changed. About three in ten (29%) changed their minds at some point. Most changes came before any treatment, and the most common pattern was stepping back from a request and later asking again. Five stopped asking altogether. Three changed after starting hormones: two stopped after reaching their goals and one stopped with regret. Nonbinary youth were more likely to change. The authors conclude that changing one's mind is a normal part of teenage gender exploration and that ongoing mental health support is valuable. The study is small, from one clinic, relied on clinicians' memories rather than the teens, and left out many followed under two years.
Key findings
- מבין 68 בני נוער שביקשו הורמונים של המין השני ו/או ניתוח, 20 (29%) שינו את בקשתם במהלך המעקב.
- צעירים א-בינאריים היו חלק גדול יותר מאלה ששינו (9 מתוך 20, לעומת 6 מתוך 48 שלא שינו). גיל, אוטיזם ומין בלידה לא יצרו הבדל ברור.
- 17 מתוך 20 השינויים (85%) קרו לפני תחילת כל טיפול. התבנית הנפוצה ביותר (9 צעירים, 45%) הייתה בקשת טיפול, משיכת הבקשה ובקשה מחדש בהמשך.
- חמישה צעירים (רבע מאלה ששינו) משכו את בקשתם ולא חידשו אותה במהלך המעקב, ועוד אחד רק 'שקל' טיפול בעתיד.
- שלושה שינו לאחר שהתחילו הורמונים: שניים הפסיקו לאחר שהשיגו את מטרותיהם, ואחד הפסיק ודיווח על חרטה תוך כדי מחלת נפש קשה.
- תשעה מ-20 ששינו (45%) תיארו גם שינוי בזהות המגדרית, לרוב מגבר טרנס או אישה טרנס לא-בינארי. הזהות של צעיר אחד עברה דרך הזדהות עם המין שנולד בו לפני שהתייצבה כגבר טרנס.
- הסיבות התחלקו לשתי קבוצות: עדיין מבררים את המגדר (רצון בניסיון חיים נוסף, חקר זהות) ולחצים מאחרים (חוסר תמיכה, חששות מיציאה מהארון, לחץ חברתי שהורגש).
Abstract
Purpose: Gender-affirming hormones and/or surgeries seeking to change the body can have potentially lasting effects. Changes in requests for these therapies among gender-diverse youth are not well-understood. The study aim is to characterize factors associated with shifts in gender-related medical requests.
Methods: This mixed-methods study used retrospective chart review and qualitative interviews with clinicians. Of 130 youth receiving clinical gender care at Children's National Hospital, 68 met inclusion criteria. Qualitative interview analysis was performed to identify patterns and themes around shifts in gender-related medical requests over time. Statistical analysis employed chi-square and t-tests to compare characteristics in the shift versus no-shift groups and kappa statistics to calculate qualitative coding agreement.
Results: Of the 68 youth followed over time (mean age 15.11 years, 47% autistic, 22% nonbinary), 20 (29%) reported a shift in request. No significant differences were found by age, autism status, or designated sex at birth. More youth with shifts were nonbinary (p = .012). Six shift profiles were identified from qualitative interviews with excellent reliability (κ = 0.865). Four of the profiles reflect shifts in request prior to starting treatment (85% sample); two involved shifts after commencing treatment (15%). The most common profile reflected a medical request that was made, withdrawn, and re-requested (45%).
Discussion: Shifts in gender-affirming medical requests by gender-diverse youth may not be uncommon during the adolescent's gender discernment process, and may more likely occur among nonbinary youth. Many individuals who experience shifts away from medical treatment may later resume the request.
Conclusion
Shifts in requests for gender-affirming hormone therapy and/or surgery by gender diverse youth may not be uncommon during their gender discernment process. These shifts may be more likely to occur among nonbinary youth. Initial evidence suggests that these shifts may not be more common among autistic youth. Many youth who experience shifts away from medical treatment may later resume the request. Given these findings, to meet the gender-affirming goals and needs of youth, clinicians providing gender-affirming hormones and/or surgery must continue to clarify goals of treatment, intended outcomes, or stop-points (e.g., once a specific amount of secondary sex development occurs) over time. The clinic for this study employed most elements of the Dutch gender care approach. It is important to note that not all gender clinics employ this approach (e.g. some gender services programs advocate for informed consent for gender-affirming medical treatment without mental health evaluations). By requiring a relationship with mental health services to obtain gender-affirming hormones and/or surgery, the Dutch model may be challenging to provide, given limited availability of mental health providers with gender expertise. Our study shows that there is likely a benefit and a potential role for mental health services to support youth even when shifting away from a request for medical gender-affirming interventions, as a shift in request is not necessarily a final ending point in the gender discernment process.