Summary

This 2025 Austrian review weighs the evidence for and against 'rapid-onset gender dysphoria'. This is the idea that some teens, mostly girls, with no childhood signs suddenly identify as trans at or after puberty, partly to cope with other mental health problems and under the influence of friends and social media. The authors find Littman's original parent survey limited but a fair starting point for an idea to test. They note that a 2022 clinic study that found no support (Bauer and others) may not have measured the right thing. They find indirect support in research on peer influence, social media and detransitioners' accounts, and report seeing such a group in their own clinic. Their verdict: unproven but worth serious study. As they did not search the research systematically, it is a map of the debate, not strong evidence either way.

Key findings

• Autoriai teigia, kad dabartiniai įrodymai nepateisina nei „greitos pradžios genderinės disforijos“ priėmimo kaip įrodyto paaiškinimo, nei jos smerkimo kaip transfobiškos.
• Littman 2018 m. 256 tėvų apklausoje 83 % aprašytų jaunuolių gimė moterimis, o 63 % turėjo psichikos sveikatos ar raidos diagnozę prieš prasidedant lyties distresui.
• 2022 m. klinikos tyrimas (Bauer ir kt.) idėjai paramos neranda. Tačiau apžvalga pabrėžia Littman kritiką, kad jis „neseniai suvokta savo lytis“ traktavo kaip greitą pradžią, nesiejant su brendimu.
• Cituojamos detranzicionierių apklausos apima vieną (Vandenbussche), kurioje 70 % iš 237 detranzicionierių teigė, kad jų distresas turėjo kitas priežastis, ir vieną (Littman ir kt.), kurioje 53 % iš 78 manė, kad jų patirtis atitinka greitos pradžios idėją.
• Tyrimai apie tai, kaip valgymo sutrikimai ir savęs žalojimas plinta tarp draugų, ir apie socialinių tinklų žalą daro socialinę įtaką kai kuriems paaugliams tikėtina. Tačiau viena cituojama jungtinė analizė nustatė panašų poveikį kūno įvaizdžiui berniukams ir mergaitėms.
• Iš savo klinikos autoriai aprašo paauglių grupę su rimtomis psichikos sveikatos problemomis, kurių lyties distresas augo kartu su brendimu, COVID-19 karantinais ir didesniu socialinių tinklų naudojimu.
• Jie ragina atlikti ilgalaikius tyrimus, jungiančius paauglių, tėvų ir gydytojų nuomones, ir pabrėžia pokalbių terapijos svarbą paaugliams, turintiems ir kitų psichikos sveikatos būklių.

Abstract

The sharp rise in the number of predominantly natal female adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria and seeking treatment in specialized clinics has sparked a contentious and polarized debate among both the scientific community and the public sphere. Few explanations have been offered for these recent developments. One proposal that has generated considerable attention is the notion of "rapid-onset" gender dysphoria, which is assumed to apply to a subset of adolescents and young adults. First introduced by Lisa Littman in a 2018 study of parental reports, it describes a subset of youth, primarily natal females, with no childhood indicators of gender dysphoria but with a sudden emergence of gender dysphoria symptoms during puberty or after its completion. For them, identifying as transgender is assumed to serve as a maladaptive coping mechanism for underlying mental health issues and is linked to social influences from peer groups and through social media. The purpose of this article is to analyze this theory and its associated hypotheses against the existing evidence base and to discuss its potential implications for future research and the advancement of treatment paradigms.

Conclusion

The authors conclude that neither prematurely adopting ROGD as a valid explanatory model nor hastily condemning it as transphobic is an appropriate response, and that Littman's research has made an important contribution that the scientific community should build on. They acknowledge ROGD may offer a convenient explanatory model for those opposed to medical transition of adolescents, but argue the right response is to strengthen rather than suppress research so that its validity can be judged on evidence. They call for longitudinal, well-designed studies capturing co-occurring psychopathology, social influences and identity development, warn that neither generalized suspicion nor an uncritically permissive approach meets adolescents' needs, and stress that clinicians must be wary of their own ideological predispositions. If substantiated, the ROGD framework could refine clinical treatment.