Summary
Surgeons at the University of Michigan surveyed adults who had breast removal (mastectomy) as gender surgery at their hospital at least two years earlier. 139 of 235 eligible patients (59%) replied. The typical answers showed full satisfaction and no regret, and nobody had asked the hospital to rebuild their breasts. The authors say this confirms regret is very low. But 41% did not reply, and they had been out of surgery longer, which is when regret is more likely to show up. Thirteen people who scored very high for regret were left out, because the authors assumed they had misunderstood the questions. Typical follow-up was only 3.6 years, and the questionnaires were made for other medical decisions. The study suggests most people who answered were satisfied, but it cannot rule out real regret in the wider group.
Key findings
- 235 pessoas que fizeram retirada das mamas relacionada a gênero em um hospital universitário dos EUA entre 1990 e fevereiro de 2020 eram elegíveis, e 139 (59%) responderam à pesquisa.
- O paciente típico tinha 27 anos na cirurgia, e o tempo típico desde a cirurgia entre os que responderam foi de 3,6 anos (variando de 2 a quase 24 anos).
- A resposta típica mostrou a maior satisfação possível e arrependimento zero; a pontuação média de arrependimento foi 4 em 100.
- Treze pessoas deram pontuações de arrependimento muito altas (95 a 100 em 100) ao mesmo tempo que diziam estar satisfeitas, e os autores as deixaram de fora, presumindo que tivessem preenchido a pesquisa de forma errada.
- As pessoas que não responderam estavam havia mais tempo desde a cirurgia (tipicamente 4,6 contra 3,6 anos) e tinham menos registro de depressão (44% contra 68%) ou ansiedade (44% contra 70%).
- Cerca de 1 em 5 dos que responderam (27 pessoas, 19%) agora descrevia seu gênero de forma diferente do momento da cirurgia; sua pontuação típica de arrependimento também era zero.
- Ninguém, tendo respondido ou não, havia pedido ou feito uma operação de reversão nesse hospital.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: There has been increasing legislative interest in regulating gender-affirming surgery, in part due to the concern about decisional regret. The regret rate following gender-affirming surgery is thought to be approximately 1%; however, previous studies relied heavily on ad hoc instruments.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term decisional regret and satisfaction with decision using validated instruments following gender-affirming mastectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this cross-sectional study, a survey of patient-reported outcomes was sent between February 1 and July 31, 2022, to patients who had undergone gender-affirming mastectomy at a US tertiary referral center between January 1, 1990, and February 29, 2020.
EXPOSURE: Decisional regret and satisfaction with decision to undergo gender-affirming mastectomy.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Long-term patient-reported outcomes, including the Holmes-Rovner Satisfaction With Decision scale, the Decision Regret Scale, and demographic characteristics, were collected. Additional information was collected via medical record review. Descriptive statistics and univariable analysis using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to compare responders and nonresponders.
RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were deemed eligible for the study, and 139 responded (59.1% response rate). Median age at the time of surgery was 27.1 (IQR, 23.0-33.4) years for responders and 26.4 (IQR, 23.1-32.7) years for nonresponders. Nonresponders (n = 96) had a longer postoperative follow-up period than responders (median follow-up, 4.6 [IQR, 3.1-8.6] vs 3.6 [IQR, 2.7-5.3] years, respectively; P = .002). Nonresponders vs responders also had lower rates of depression (42 [44%] vs 94 [68%]; P < .001) and anxiety (42 [44%] vs 97 [70%]; P < .001). No responders or nonresponders requested or underwent a reversal procedure. The median Satisfaction With Decision Scale score was 5.0 (IQR, 5.0-5.0) on a 5-point scale, with higher scores noting higher satisfaction. The median Decision Regret Scale score was 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0) on a 100-point scale, with lower scores noting lower levels of regret. A univariable regression analysis could not be performed to identify characteristics associated with low satisfaction with decision or high decisional regret due to the lack of variation in these responses.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional survey study, the results of validated survey instruments indicated low rates of decisional regret and high levels of satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming mastectomy. The lack of dissatisfaction and regret impeded the ability to perform a more complex statistical analysis, highlighting the need for condition-specific instruments to assess decisional regret and satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming surgery.
Conclusion
In this cross-sectional survey study, the results of validated survey instruments indicated low rates of decisional regret and high levels of satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming mastectomy. The lack of dissatisfaction and regret impeded the ability to perform a more complex statistical analysis, highlighting the need for condition-specific instruments to assess decisional regret and satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming surgery. (Discussion: "While prospective, multicenter work is needed, these results are consistent with previous ad hoc studies and affirm the overwhelmingly low levels of regret following gender-affirming surgery.")