Summary

As part of England's Cass Review, researchers at the University of York searched for every guideline or guidance document on caring for under-18s with gender dysphoria (distress about one's sex) and rated their quality using a standard checklist. They found 23 documents published between 1998 and 2022. Most scored poorly on how carefully they were developed, how usable they were, and independence from their makers. Few were built on careful reviews of the evidence, and it was often unclear how advice was reached. Guidelines from WPATH and the Endocrine Society influenced most others, so guidelines largely cited each other. Only Sweden's and Finland's evidence-based guidelines were recommended by all three raters. The review followed a plan registered in advance, but rating guidelines involves judgement, and critics dispute how the Cass reviews were framed.

Key findings

• Pregled je našel 23 smernic ali dokumentov z navodili (4 mednarodne, 3 regionalne, 16 nacionalnih), objavljenih med 1998 in 2022.
• Večina je dosegla dobre ocene za razlago svojega namena, slabe pa za skrbnost razvoja, uporabnost in neodvisnost.
• Samo šest dokumentov je doseglo več kot 30 % za skrbni razvoj; smernice WPATH iz 2022 so dosegle 35 %, smernice Endocrine Society iz 2017 pa 42 %.
• Samo švedske (2022) in finske (2020) smernice so za skrbni razvoj dosegle več kot 50 % in so jih vsi trije ocenjevalci priporočili za uporabo.
• Deset smernic je vključevalo bolnike ali njihove predstavnike, vendar sta le dve rekli, da sta neposredno vprašali otroke, najstnike ali starše.
• Navodila WPATH in Endocrine Society so bila podlaga za večino nacionalnih in regionalnih navodil, obe skupini pa sta povezani s skupnim sponzorstvom.
• Avtorji zaključujejo, da večini navodil manjka neodvisen, na dokazih temelječ pristop, in da bi morale storitve to upoštevati, preden se nanje zanesejo.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence are being referred to specialist gender services. There are various guidelines outlining approaches to the clinical care of these children and adolescents. AIM: To examine the quality and development of published guidelines or clinical guidance containing recommendations for managing gender dysphoria/incongruence in children and/or adolescents (age 0-18). A separate paper reports the synthesis of guideline recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched to April 2022 and web-based searches and contact with international experts continued to December 2022, with results assessed independently by two reviewers. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used to examine guideline quality. RESULTS: Twenty-three guidelines/clinical guidance publications (1998-2022) were identified (4 international, 3 regional and 16 national). The quality and methods reporting in these varied considerably. Few guidelines systematically reviewed empirical evidence, and links between evidence and recommendations were often unclear. Although most consulted with relevant stakeholders, including 10 which involved service users or user representatives, it was often unclear how this influenced recommendations and only two reported including children/adolescents and/or parents. Guidelines also lacked clarity about implementation. Two international guidelines (World Professional Association for Transgender Health and Endocrine Society) formed the basis for most other guidance, influencing their development and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Most clinical guidance for managing children/adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence lacks an independent and evidence-based approach and information about how recommendations were developed. This should be considered when using these to inform service development and clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021289659.

Conclusion

Most clinical guidance for managing children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence lacks an independent and evidence-based approach and information about how recommendations were developed. The WPATH and Endocrine Society international guidelines, which like other guidance lack developmental rigour and transparency, have dominated the field and are linked through co-sponsorship; healthcare services and professionals should take into account the poor quality and inter-related nature of published guidance when using it to inform service development and clinical practice.