Dauerhafter Verlust: Frau, die ihre Geschlechtsangleichung rückgängig gemacht hat, trauert über die Unfähigkeit zu stillen nach Mastektomie

Trauer über die Unfähigkeit zu stillen nach einer brustmaskulinisierenden Mastektomie und Detransition

Fallberichte Detransition & Reue Operationen

Authors: Karleen D. Gribble, Susan Bewley, Hannah G. Dahlen
Journal: Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Year: 2023
Source: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2023.1073053/full

Summary

This paper tells the story of one woman who had her breasts removed as part of a gender transition, later stopped transitioning, and then grieved deeply when she could not breastfeed her baby. The authors point out that the main transgender health guidelines (WPATH, AusPATH and PATHA) do not tell surgeons to discuss breastfeeding before this surgery. They also describe how midwives and doctors who did not understand detransition made her pregnancy and early motherhood harder. They call for honest talks about breastfeeding before surgery, better training for maternity staff, emotional support and access to donor milk. It is a vivid and useful warning, but it is one person's account, told from memory and not checked against her surgical or clinic records, so it cannot tell us how common this experience is.

Key findings

Bei Elizabeth wurde eine Geschlechtsidentitätsstörung diagnostiziert, und ihr wurde mit 18 Testosteron verschrieben. Mit 20 wurden ihr beide Brüste entfernt und die Brustwarzen wieder aufgesetzt. Sie erinnert sich an kein Gespräch darüber, wie sich das aufs Stillen auswirken würde.
Die Operation hinterließ dicke, schmerzhafte Narben und Brustwarzen, die schmerzten und tropften. Zusammen mit der Ablehnung durch transgender Freunde sowie Scheidentrockenheit und -verdünnung durch Testosteron führte das zu einer Krise, und sie beendete die Transition mit 24.
Elizabeth sagte, sie hätte damals wahrscheinlich ein Gespräch über das Stillen abgelehnt. Heute sieht sie das als Vermeidung, bei der ihr Geschlechtsleidensdruck als „Trumpfkarte“ diente, die jede Diskussion beendete.
Mit 30 schwanger, trauerte sie darüber, nicht stillen zu können. Ihre Hebamme sagte ihr, sie solle „einfach mit Flasche füttern“, und ein Arzt nannte sie weiter einen Mann. Die Verwirrung führte zu einer Kinderschutzmeldung, während eine Milchbank ihr freundlicherweise Spendermilch gab.
Die Autoren weisen darauf hin, dass die internationalen und australischen Leitlinien zur Gesundheit von transgender Personen (WPATH, AusPATH und PATHA) nicht empfehlen, vor dieser Operation über das Stillen zu sprechen. Sie argumentieren, dass das Aufsetzen der Brustwarzen das Stillen mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit unmöglich macht.
Sie argumentieren, dass die Forschung dazu, wie oft Menschen eine Detransition machen, und zum Nutzen der Brustentfernung, besonders bei Jugendlichen, schwach ist: Die Personen werden nur kurz nachverfolgt, und viele brechen die Studien ab.
Sie empfehlen eine ehrliche Stillberatung vor der Operation, Schulungen für Geburtshilfepersonal zu detransitionierten Frauen, emotionale Unterstützung bei Trauer ums Stillen und Zugang zu Spendermilch.

Abstract

An increasing number of young females are undergoing chest masculinisation mastectomy to affirm a gender identity and/or to relieve gender dysphoria. Some desist in their transgender identification and/or become reconciled with their sex, and then revert (or detransition). To the best of our knowledge, this report presents the first published case of a woman who had chest masculinisation surgery to affirm a gender identity as a trans man, but who later detransitioned, became pregnant and grieved her inability to breastfeed. She described a lack of understanding by maternity health providers of her experience and the importance she placed on breastfeeding. Subsequent poor maternity care contributed to her distress. The absence of breast function as a consideration in transgender surgical literature is highlighted. That breastfeeding is missing in counselling and consent guidelines for chest masculinisation mastectomy is also described as is the poor quality of existing research on detransition rates and benefit or otherwise of chest masculinising mastectomy. Recommendations are made for improving maternity care for detransitioned women. Increasing numbers of chest masculinisation mastectomies will likely be followed by more new mothers without functioning breasts who will require honest, knowledgeable, and compassionate care.

Conclusion

Until recently, it would be extremely unusual for a new mother to have had a mastectomy. With increasing numbers of female adolescents and young adults obtaining chest masculinisation mastectomies, more new mothers will present without functioning breasts. Some will retain a transgender identification and others will have detransitioned. Each requires an individualised approach to provide them and their infants with honest, knowledgeable, and compassionate care.

Methodological limitations

Only one person: The report describes one woman's experience. As the authors say, we don't know how typical it is of detransitioned women, and it cannot show how often breastfeeding grief or poor maternity care happen.
Told from memory years later: The account comes from one three-hour interview a decade or more after surgery. Her memory that breastfeeding was never discussed, and her views on what her doctors thought, cannot be checked.
Key records missing: Elizabeth provided pregnancy records, a milk bank referral and photos of her scars. Her surgery, consent and gender clinic records were not reported, so what she was told before surgery is known only from her memory.
How she was found isn't explained: The report does not say how the authors came across Elizabeth. She describes being a 'trans activist' and later 'persona non grata', so she may have been found through detransition networks.
Story written with her: The case was written 'in consultation with Elizabeth' and she approved the final paper. This respects her, but it means the authors were less independent in how they told the story.
Authors have stated views: The authors have written before about sex-based language in maternity care and about regret after gender surgery (three of the cited papers are their own), and they frame the case as 'unanticipated harm'. They declare no financial conflicts, but readers should know their positions.
Staff side not heard: The midwife, doctor and surgeon were not asked for their views. Explanations for how they acted, for example that they were following transgender care training, rest on the patient's interpretation.
Breastfeeding claims borrowed from other surgery: The authors admit there is no research on how different breast removal methods for transition affect breastfeeding, so they rely on breast reduction studies. The case is strong for grafted nipples, but less certain for other methods.
Evidence judged unevenly: The report sharply criticises studies that find low regret for short follow-up and dropouts, but cites surveys of self-selected detransitioners (such as Littman 2021) without the same criticism.
Some details changed: The authors say 'some details have been changed to preserve anonymity'. This is reasonable, but readers can't know which details are exact.

detrans.ai

Summary

Key findings

Abstract

Conclusion