Summary

Researchers interviewed 28 Canadians who had stopped or reversed a gender transition about their health care. Many stopped hormones suddenly and without medical advice, often because they feared being judged by clinicians or found care hard to get. They described changes in mood and energy, gender distress coming back, and doctors who did not know how to help. Many relied on online detransition communities instead. Some younger people had been pushed by parents to stop and later restarted. Most of those who had medically transitioned did not regret it, while about a fifth did. The study makes a believable case that people who stop treatment lack medical guidance and support. It cannot say how common these experiences or views are, because the group was small, self-selected and loosely defined, and the interviewers had all used gender-affirming treatment.

Key findings

• カナダの成人28人（女性として生まれた18人、男性として生まれた10人、71%が20～29歳）に聞き取りを行いました。27人が医学的にトランジションをしており、そのうち56%が18～24歳で開始していました。
• デトランジションの理由には、健康への不安、手術の合併症、性自認の感覚の変化、支えてくれない親やパートナー、差別、ケアを受けることの難しさが含まれていました。
• 多くの人が、メンタルヘルスの支援や医学的な監督なしに、突然（「いきなり」）ホルモンをやめ、クリニックは、彼らが通わなくなった後にほとんどフォローアップをしませんでした。
• 人々は、臨床医がデトランジションについて準備ができていない、または批判的だと述べ、多くは代わりにオンラインのデトランジションのグループで情報を探しました。
• 医学的にトランジションした27人のうち、18人（67%）は後悔を表明しないか過去の治療に肯定的で、6人（22%）は後悔し、3人（11%）は複雑な気持ちでした。
• 精巣または卵巣の摘出後にホルモンを切り替えた人は、通常は医学的な監督を受けていましたが、そのケアを不十分だったと述べることが多くありました。
• 著者らは、デトランジションについての医学的な指針と、治療をやめたり元に戻したりする患者を臨床医が責めないことを求めています。

Abstract

Importance: Medical education, research, and clinical guidelines are available to support the initiation of gender-affirming care for transgender and nonbinary people. By contrast, little is known about the clinical experiences of those who discontinue or seek to reverse gender-affirming medical or surgical interventions due to a change in gender identity, often referred to as detransition.

Objective: To examine the physical and mental health experiences of people who initiated medical or surgical detransition to inform clinical practice.

Design, setting, and participants: Using constructivist grounded theory as a qualitative approach, data were collected in the form of in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed using an inductive 2-stage coding process to categorize and interpret detransition-related health care experiences to inform clinical practice. Between October 2021 and January 2022, individuals living in Canada who were aged 18 years and older with experience of stopping, shifting, or reversing a gender transition were invited to partake in semistructured virtual interviews. Study advertisements were circulated over social media, to clinicians, and within participants' social networks. A purposive sample of 28 participants who discontinued, shifted, or reversed a gender transition were interviewed.

Main outcomes and measures: In-depth, narrative descriptions of the physical and mental health experiences of people who discontinued or sought to reverse prior gender-affirming medical and/or surgical interventions.

Results: Among the 28 participants, 18 (64%) were assigned female at birth and 10 (36%) were assigned male at birth; 2 (7%) identified as Jewish and White, 5 (18%) identified as having mixed race and ethnicity (which included Arab, Black, Indigenous, Latinx, and South Asian), and 21 (75%) identified as White. Participants initially sought gender-affirmation at a wide range of ages (15 [56%] were between ages 18 and 24 years). Detransition occurred for various reasons, such as an evolving understanding of gender identity or health concerns. Participants reported divergent perspectives about their past gender-affirming medical or surgical treatments. Some participants felt regrets, but a majority were pleased with the results of gender-affirming medical or surgical treatments. Medical detransition was often experienced as physically and psychologically challenging, yet health care avoidance was common. Participants described experiencing stigma and interacting with clinicians who were unprepared to meet their detransition-related medical needs.

Conclusions and relevance: This study's results suggest that further research and clinical guidance is required to address the unmet needs of this population who discontinue or seek to reverse prior gender-affirming interventions.

Conclusion

This study's results suggest that further research and clinical guidance is required to address the unmet needs of this population who discontinue or seek to reverse prior gender-affirming interventions. The authors report accounts of people ceasing or reversing gender-affirming treatments with sub-optimal care, and call for research on clinicians' knowledge of detransition and the sources of detransition-related stigma.