北美调查发现:43%的去过渡者表示医疗提供者似乎从未了解过去过渡

“医疗提供者对我束手无策”:对性与性别少数群体去过渡/再过渡的支持、护理和信息需求的混合方法分析

Authors
Kirsty Rackliff, Pablo Expósito-Campos, Wren Ariel Gould, David J. Kinitz, Madeline Rosen, S. Rudd, June S. H. Lam, Annie Pullen Sansfaçon, Kinnon Ross MacKinnon
Journal
International Journal of Transgender Health
Year
2025

Summary

Researchers surveyed 957 people in the US and Canada who said they had stopped, changed or reversed a gender transition, or wanted to. Most were born female and most described themselves as lesbian, bisexual or queer; 42% had at some point stopped and later restarted transition. Many reported poor care after detransitioning: about 43% said providers never seemed to know anything about detransition, and more than half sometimes or always avoided health care. People most often asked for clinicians who understand detransition, contact with other detransitioners, accurate advice on stopping hormones, help with reconstructive surgery, and therapy that takes trauma into account. Some stopped only because of cost, family rejection or losing access to care. The results show real unmet needs, but come from a self-selected online group and cannot show how common these experiences are.

Key findings

  • 共纳入957人(在1,377份完成的调查中,剔除机器人和虚假回答后);79%出生时为女性,74%居住在美国。
  • 大多数是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋或酷儿(45%双性恋,29%酷儿,27%女同性恋),42%曾停止后又重新开始过渡。
  • 去过渡后,43%说他们的医疗提供者似乎从不了解去过渡,只有7%说提供者总是了解。
  • 回避护理很常见:13%总是、45%有时在需要护理时回避医疗提供者,46%有时或总是需要护理却没有得到。
  • 在563份书面回答中,最常见的未满足的需求是社群和同伴支持(29%)、了解去过渡的提供者(29%)、个人支持(22%)和心理健康护理(16%)。
  • 46份回答要求提供关于安全停用激素的建议,有些人描述了被拒绝重建手术,例如被四位外科医生拒绝。
  • 有些人描述因费用、失去获得护理的机会或家人的拒绝而被迫停止,并希望得到帮助重新开始过渡。

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detransition refers to stopping, shifting, or reversal of an initial gender transition. Some people detransition temporarily, and later re-start a transition process, or retransition. Despite calls for research and care surrounding detransition/retransition, these experiences remain poorly understood by care providers and LGBTQ2S+ community-serving organizations.

METHODS: Between December 2023-April 2024, a cross-sectional survey was administered to 957 individuals (aged 16 and older) living in the US or Canada who self-identified with experiences of detransition. Participants were recruited via advertisements across eight major social media platforms, direct emails sent to ∼1200 former research participants, and to >615 LGBTQ2S+ organizations and gender-affirming care providers. Mixed qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed regarding participants' experiences and care needs during detransition and, if relevant, retransition. Data about care experiences and needs were analyzed descriptively using frequencies and percentages. Interpretive description was utilized to analyze qualitative responses.

RESULTS: Participants reported a wide range of current gender identities/expressions such as: woman (n = 386; 40.3%); gender nonconforming woman (n = 241; 25.2%); nonbinary (n = 238; 24.9%); and/or detrans woman; (n = 152; 22.5%). A majority of the sample were sexual minorities. A majority reported being bisexual (n = 429; 44.8%), queer (n = 277; 28.9%), and/or lesbian (n = 254; 26.5%). Qualitative analysis identified three key themes: (1) accessing detransition-related care needs within the gender-affirming care system; (2) detransition-related social/legal needs to navigate a second transition; and (3) detransition preventative and retransition needs. Each of these themes encompassed four subthemes, including access to detrans-knowledgeable care providers (n = 162; 28.8%); medical information (n = 62; 11.0%); mental healthcare and supports (n = 92; 16.3%); interpersonal supports (n = 124; 22.0%); and community supports (n = 163; 29.0%).

CONCLUSION: Greater understanding and community-led care relating to detransition/retransition from an LGBTQ2S+-affirming lens can help to mitigate minority stressors and distress associated with these experiences.

Conclusion

The current study contributes to the limited body of work regarding the experiences and care needs of detrans people and other SGM people who report identity fluidity and detransition/retransition. Findings indicate that, like other SGM people, detransition may be inadequately understood by some LGBTQ2S+ serving and gender-affirming care practitioners. Future research and community-led research on detransition/retransition can ameliorate this knowledge gap. Importantly, given the potential for country-specific differences in detransition/retransition experiences, future research should be more sensitive to geopolitical and healthcare delivery dynamics. (Abstract conclusion: greater understanding and community-led care relating to detransition/retransition from an LGBTQ2S+-affirming lens can help to mitigate minority stressors and distress associated with these experiences.)