內分泌學會回顧:使用荷爾蒙後短期骨密度變化不大,但幾乎沒有骨折資料

性類固醇對跨性別者骨骼健康的影響:系統性回顧與統合分析

Authors
Naykky Singh-Ospina, Spyridoula Maraka, Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Caroline Davidge-Pitts, Todd B. Nippoldt, Larry J. Prokop, Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Year
2017

Summary

This review was one of the evidence reviews behind the Endocrine Society's 2017 guideline on treating gender dysphoria (distress about one's sex). The Mayo Clinic team combined 13 studies (639 people, mostly adults) that measured bone density before and after cross-sex hormones. Testosterone in females made no measurable difference to spine or hip bone density over one to two years. Estrogen in males slightly raised spine bone density. Only one study looked at broken bones (none in a year), and only one looked at teenagers given puberty blockers (drugs that pause puberty) and then hormones. That study found males had lower spine bone density at age 22 than before treatment. The authors said the effect on the risk of broken bones is uncertain. The review is reassuring about short-term bone density in adults, but cannot show long-term safety, fracture risk, or safety for teenagers.

Key findings

  • 回顧合併了 13 項研究,涵蓋 639 人:392 人出生時為男性,247 人出生時為女性。
  • 服用睪固酮的女性,下脊椎和髖部的骨質密度在一或兩年後沒有可測量的變化。
  • 服用雌激素的男性,下脊椎的骨質密度在一年後略有上升,兩年後又多一點。
  • 只有一項研究(53 名男性和 53 名女性)看了骨折,發現 12 個月內沒有。
  • 只有一項研究涵蓋先使用青春期阻斷劑、再使用荷爾蒙的青少年,發現男性在 22 歲時脊椎骨質密度低於治療前。
  • 作者表示,多數證據來自有中等誤導風險的研究,而對骨折風險的影響仍不確定。
  • 這項回顧是為內分泌學會進行的,使用與其專家擬定的計畫,以支持其 2017 年的指引。

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of sex steroids on bone health in transgender individuals is unclear.

METHODS: A comprehensive search of several databases to 7 April 2015 was conducted for studies evaluating bone health in transgender individuals receiving sex steroids. Pairs of reviewers selected and appraised studies. A random effects model was used to pool weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: Thirteen studies evaluating 639 transgender individuals were identified [392 male-to-female (MTF), 247 female-to-male (FTM)]. In FTM individuals and compared with baseline values before initiation of masculinizing hormone therapy, there was no statistically significant difference in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip bone mineral density (BMD) when assessed at 12 and 24 months. In MTF individuals and compared with baseline values before initiation of feminizing hormone therapy, there was a statistically significant increase in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months (0.04 g/cm2; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.06 g/cm2) and 24 months (0.06 g/cm2; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.08 g/cm2). Fracture rates were evaluated in a single cohort of 53 MTF and 53 FTM individuals, with no events at 12 months. The body of evidence is derived mostly from observational studies at moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSION: In FTM individuals, masculinizing hormone therapy was not associated with significant changes in BMD, whereas in MTF individuals feminizing hormone therapy was associated with an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine. The impact of these BMD changes on patient-important outcomes such as fracture risk is uncertain.

Conclusion

In FTM individuals, masculinizing hormone therapy was not associated with significant changes in BMD, whereas in MTF individuals feminizing hormone therapy was associated with an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine. The impact of these BMD changes on patient-important outcomes such as fracture risk is uncertain.