Summary
Researchers at Toronto's gender clinic re-contacted boys first seen in childhood, at about age 7, and assessed them again at about age 21. Of 139 boys, 12.2% still had gender distress and 87.8% no longer did. Most grew out of it even among boys who had met the full diagnosis (86.4%). Most grew up attracted to men or to both sexes. Boys whose distress continued tended to be older when first seen, from poorer families, and more strongly gender non-conforming as children. It is the largest study of its kind, and 95.9% of those approached took part. But more than half of eligible patients were never contacted, and the ways of measuring changed over time. The boys were also seen in an era when early social transition was rare and therapy often tried to reduce cross-gender behaviour. So its rates may not apply to children seen at clinics today.
Key findings
- 在童年時因性別認同問題就診的 139 名男孩中,17 人(12.2%)到約 21 歲時仍有性別困擾,122 人(87.8%)不再有。
- 即使在童年時符合完整診斷的 88 名男孩中,多數也不再有:12 人(13.6%)仍有困擾,而未符合者 51 人中有 5 人(9.8%),這個差距很可能只是偶然。
- 成年初期,多數被男性或兩性所吸引:在 129 人的幻想中占 63.6%,在 108 人的性生活中占 47.2%,另有 25.9% 回報沒有性活動。
- 困擾持續的男孩,與困擾消退、被男性吸引的男孩相比,往往初診時年紀較大、來自較貧窮的家庭,而且童年時更不符合性別規範。
- 在 145 名受邀的患者中,只有 6 人拒絕(95.9% 參與),但有 163 名符合資格的患者因為研究缺乏資源而從未被聯絡,另有 19 人找不到。
- 只有一名男孩在青春期前進行過社會性過渡,因此這項研究顯示的是在大多不進行過渡、常以治療為基礎的做法下發生的情形,而不是今天的肯定式照護。
- 作者表示,結果與早期的追蹤研究一致,顯示在門診就診的男孩大多數會脫離性別困擾。
Abstract
This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation. In childhood, the boys were assessed at a mean age of 7.49 years (range, 3.33-12.99) at a mean year of 1989 and followed-up at a mean age of 20.58 years (range, 13.07- 39.15) at a mean year of 2002. In childhood, 88 (63.3%) of the boys met the DSM-III, III-R, or IV criteria for gender identity disorder; the remaining 51 (36.7%) boys were subthreshold for the criteria. At follow-up, gender identity/dysphoria was assessed via multiple methods and the participants were classified as either persisters or desisters. Sexual orientation was ascertained for both fantasy and behavior and then dichotomized as either biphilic/androphilic or gynephilic. Of the 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were classified as persisters and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters. Data on sexual orientation in fantasy were available for 129 participants: 82 (63.6%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 43 (33.3%) were classified as gynephilic, and 4 (3.1%) reported no sexual fantasies. For sexual orientation in behavior, data were available for 108 participants: 51 (47.2%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 29 (26.9%) were classified as gynephilic, and 28 (25.9%) reported no sexual behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of outcome for the biphilic/androphilic persisters and the gynephilic desisters, with the biphilic/androphilic desisters as the reference group. Compared to the reference group, the biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at the time of the assessment in childhood, were from a lower social class background, and, on a dimensional composite of sex-typed behavior in childhood were more gender- variant. The biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant compared to the gynephilic desisters. Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The implications of the data for current models of care for the treatment of gender dysphoria in children are discussed.
Conclusion
This study provided follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139). Three key findings emerged: (1) The persistence of gender dysphoria was relatively low at 12.2% (17 persisters), while desistance was 87.8% (122 desisters); (2) A high percentage had a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation—in fantasy, 63.6% (82 of 129 participants), and in behavior, 47.2% (51 of 108 participants); (3) Predictors of outcome included childhood age at assessment, social class, and degree of childhood gender-variant behavior. Specifically, biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at childhood assessment, from lower social class backgrounds, and more gender-variant in childhood. Biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant than gynephilic desisters. The threshold vs. subthreshold GID diagnostic status in childhood did not significantly predict persistence. The authors note that these data were collected during a period when gender social transition prior to puberty was not commonly recommended, contrasting with more recent clinical approaches. The findings support prior research showing that desistance from gender dysphoria is the more common outcome in childhood-referred boys, and that dimensional measures of childhood sex-typed behavior provide added nuance in predicting long-term trajectories. The implications of these data for current models of care for treating gender dysphoria in children are discussed, particularly in light of contemporary approaches that may include earlier social transition and puberty-blocking interventions.