切除生殖器官后,39%的跨性别男性和非二元者对生育选择表示后悔

跨性别男性或性别非二元者在性别肯定手术后的生育力保存选择与决定后悔

Authors
Austin Johnson, Asha B. McClurg, Janine Baldino, Rajeshree Das, Erin T. Carey
Journal
F&S Reports
Year
2024

Summary

Surgeons at the University of North Carolina surveyed trans men and nonbinary people who had their womb and/or ovaries removed. They asked about regret over the fertility decisions made before surgery, not regret about the surgery itself. Of 57 people who replied, about 2.5 years after surgery, 39% had at least mild regret and 16% moderate to severe regret. Nearly everyone had turned down seeing a fertility specialist, most often because they did not want children at the time, and no one froze eggs or embryos. Records said all had been given fertility advice, but only 30% remembered it, and those who felt the advice was poor had more regret. More people rated having a family in future as important after surgery than before. With only half replying, one clinic and short follow-up, the true level of regret is uncertain and could be higher or lower.

Key findings

  • 2014至2023年间在北卡罗来纳大学切除了生殖器官的112名跨性别男性和非二元性别者中,有57人(51%)回答了调查,平均在手术后约2.5年。
  • 在一份经过检验的后悔问卷上,39%对手术前所做的生育选择有后悔:23%为轻度,16%为中度到重度(得分最高达100分中的85分)。
  • 病历显示每个人都得到了生育方面的建议,但只有30%记得被告知过生育或组建家庭的方式。
  • 记录显示97%被提供了生育专家,但只有3人(5.5%)接受,且没有人继续冷冻卵子或胚胎。
  • 拒绝最常见的原因是当时不想要孩子(68%),其次是计划领养、担心停用睾酮,以及担心怀孕会加重性别痛苦。
  • 认为关于对生育影响的建议不好的人后悔要高得多(典型得分50对0),认为关于生育选择的建议不好的人也略高(12.5对0)。
  • 与手术前相比,调查时更多的人认为将来拥有孩子或家庭很重要,这表明观点在手术后可能改变。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices after gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional.

SETTING: University-based pratice.

PATIENTS: A total of 57 survey respondents identifying as transgender men or gender nonbinary with a history of gender-affirming surgery or removal of reproductive organs between 2014 and 2023 with the University of North Carolina Minimally Invasive Gynecology division.

INTERVENTION: Survey or questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence and severity of decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices were measured with the use of the validated decisional regret scale (DRS) (scored 0-100). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers to pursuing reproductive endocrinology and infertility consultation and fertility preservation treatment.

RESULTS: The survey response rate was 50.9% (57/112). "Mild" to "severe" decisional regret was reported by 38.6% (n = 22) of survey respondents, with DRS scores among all respondents ranging from 0-85. Higher median DRS scores were associated with patient-reported inadequacy of preoperative fertility counseling regarding implications of surgery on future fertility or family-building (0 vs. 50) and fertility preservation options (0 vs. 12.5). No desire for future fertility at the time of fertility counseling was the most frequent reason (68.4%) for declining a referral to reproductive endocrinology and infertility for additional fertility preservation discussion.

CONCLUSIONS: Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret.

Conclusion

Decisional regret regarding preoperative fertility preservation choices is experienced among transgender men or gender nonbinary persons after gender-affirming surgery or the removal of reproductive organs. Preoperative, patient-centered fertility counseling and fertility preservation treatments should be provided to reduce the risk of future regret. (Full text adds that care should include equitable access to family-building options in the context of decreasing access to gender-affirming care.)