僅56%完成治療：英國診所研究顯示高輟學率和不良結果

Summary

Clinicians at an English adult gender clinic reviewed the notes of everyone discharged in one year. They wanted to see who got the treatment they wanted, who dropped out, and who went back to living as their birth sex. Just over half completed the planned treatment. 58% got everything they first asked for. Nearly all who wanted hormones got them, but fewer than half who wanted genital surgery had it. About one in five stopped attending and one in five were referred back soon after leaving. People with autism or similar conditions, more childhood hardship, or drug, alcohol or mental health problems during treatment were less likely to get care as planned. Twelve people (6.9%) detransitioned, far more than an earlier UK clinic figure of 0.3%. Because data came only from notes and follow-up was at most 16 months, the detransition figure is probably too low.

Key findings

在一年內結案的 175 名成人中，56.1% 完成了計畫的治療，58% 得到了最初要求的所有治療。
想要荷爾蒙的人有 94% 得到了，但想要生殖器手術的人只有 47.7% 得到（男變女手術為 56.5%，女變男手術為 25.8%）。
在 16 個月的資料中，21.7% 停止到門診就診，19.4% 被轉回原轉介單位，其中多數（34 人中的 24 人）沒有完成治療。
自閉症及類似狀況（機率約高出 6 倍）、每多一種童年逆境（約 1.5 倍）、治療期間的藥物或酒精問題（約 4 倍），以及治療期間的心理健康問題（約 2 倍），各自都與沒有按計畫得到照護有關。
有 12 人（6.9%）符合本研究對去過渡的定義。其中兩人有後悔的紀錄，12 人中有四人後來又被轉回門診。
42.9% 的患者在治療期間有心理健康問題的紀錄，有三人在治療期間死於自殺。
作者警告，新的、更快速的服務模式可能無法滿足這群多樣且複雜的患者的需求。

Abstract

Background: UK adult gender identity clinics (GICs) are implementing a new streamlined service model. However, there is minimal evidence from these services underpinning this. It is also unknown how many service users subsequently 'detransition'. Aims: To describe service users' access to care and patterns of service use, specifically, interventions accessed, reasons for discharge and re-referrals; to identify factors associated with access; and to quantify 'detransitioning'. Method: A retrospective case-note review was performed as a service evaluation for 175 service users consecutively discharged by a tertiary National Health Service adult GIC between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2018. Descriptive statistics were used for rates of accessing interventions sought, reasons for discharge, re-referral and frequency of detransitioning. Using multivariate analysis, we sought associations between several variables and 'accessing care' or 'other outcome'. Results: The treatment pathway was completed by 56.1%. All interventions initially sought were accessed by 58%; 94% accessed hormones but only 47.7% accessed gender reassignment surgery; 21.7% disengaged; and 19.4% were re-referred. Multivariate analysis identified coexisting neurodevelopmental disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.7-19), previous adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) per reported ACE (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9), substance misuse during treatment (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.1-17.6) and mental health concerns during treatment (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4) as independently associated with accessing care. Twelve people (6.9%) met our case definition of detransitioning. Conclusions: Service users may have unmet needs. Neurodevelopmental disorders or ACEs suggest complexity requiring consideration during the assessment process. Managing mental ill health and substance misuse during treatment needs optimising. Detransitioning might be more frequent than previously reported.

Conclusion

Service users may have unmet needs. Neurodevelopmental disorders or ACEs suggest complexity requiring consideration during the assessment process. Managing mental ill health and substance misuse during treatment needs optimising. Detransitioning might be more frequent than previously reported.

Methodological limitations

Notes only: The study relied only on routine clinic notes with missing information. The authors say there may be important factors they could not look at.
Other conditions likely under-recorded: The clinic does not diagnose mental or physical conditions itself, so other diagnoses depended on records from elsewhere and may be too low.
Clinic's idea of success: 'Getting care' was defined by the clinic's own treatment pathway. The authors admit they do not know if patients would see it the same way, because patient satisfaction is not routinely recorded.
No health results: Changes in mental or physical health could not be measured because of missing data, so the study cannot say whether treatment helped.
Too short to catch detransition: Data stopped 16 months after the last discharge, while detransition is often reported 4 to 8 years after transition and regret after about 10 years. So the 6.9% figure is likely too low.
Detransitions may be missed: Nothing tells the clinic when former patients detransition, so other cases may have been missed. Regret was recorded for only two people, and others may or may not have felt it.
Narrow definition: Detransition meant going back to living in one's birth sex. Six more people with partial transitions, on-and-off hormone use or cancelled surgery did not count, and two who stopped hormones without going back were left out.
Mostly one person checking notes: Only the first 20 of 175 sets of notes were checked by a second person; the other 155 were reviewed by one author alone.
Uncertain numbers: Small groups made the figures very uncertain. For example, autism and similar conditions could mean anywhere from about 2 to 19 times higher odds of not getting care.
Clinicians' choices may play a part: The authors note that the link between mental health or drug problems and not getting care may partly reflect clinicians being reluctant to refer these patients for surgery, which the data cannot separate.
Some treatments left out: Speech and voice therapy was too poorly recorded to include, and talking therapy was not looked at because what was offered changed during the study.
One clinic, one year: One of seven English adult gender clinics over one year of discharges, so patterns may differ elsewhere or later. The three suicides during treatment could not be compared with other clinics.

detrans.ai

Summary

Key findings

Abstract

Conclusion